NEC LaVie X 15.6 Ultrabook Unveiled In Japan As Worlds Thinnest

NEC LaVie X 15.6 Ultrabook Unveiled In Japan As Worlds Thinnest

In Japan this week NEC has unveiled a new addition to their range in the form of the LaVie X 15.6 Ultrabook, which NEC is claiming is currently the worlds thinnest in production. The NEC LaVie X 15.6 Ultrabook is powered by a Core i7-3517U 1.9 [ Continue reading...] The post NEC LaVie X 15.6 Ultrabook Unveiled In Japan As Worlds Thinnest appeared first on Geeky Gadgets.

Source: http://www.facebook.com/GeekyGadgets/posts/10151198492795967

2013 dodge dart shameless kwame brown martin luther king day blue ivy devil inside dash diet

Obama?s ?Lucy Move the Football? Fiscal Cliff Plan Still Not Balanced

Volleys of negotiating counter-offers are coming in faster now that Christmas break and the looming fiscal cliff are just around the corner.

While there is much unsatisfactory with Speaker of the House John Boehner?s (R?OH) Sunday night proposal, let us not forget that the reason we are watching this needless, high stakes drama unfold is due to President Obama?s intractable insistence on tax increases on America?s high earners. After all, he and Congress could simply and quickly pass a bill to extend all current policies and avoid the fiscal cliff entirely?if he wanted to. No, this is really about hiking taxes on high earners. Thus the charade of deficit reduction continues.

Obama?s latest counteroffer is no more acceptable than his first offer. Short on details concerning actual spending reductions, especially on entitlements, it is replete with his requisite tax hikes and (we are shocked) new stimulus spending. The cherry on top is an extension of the debt limit for two years, essentially handing over authority to raise it to the President.

Right.

The President originally called for around $800 billion in tax hikes on America?s ?highest? earners?those earning $250,000 and up. A ridiculous demand when the economy is still struggling under his big spending and regulatory policies, and one which would squarely hit smaller businesses. You know, the ones who actually create jobs.

Yet, just like Lucy and the football, when Boehner and company offered up $800 billion in tax hikes, Obama quickly doubled his demand to $1.5 trillion in tax hikes?again, all from the highest earners. They, he tells us, can afford to pay a little more. Never mind, of course, that the top 1 percent of earners already pay 37 percent of all income taxes. Somehow we are to believe this is a ?balanced approach.?

Obama pitches all this on the pretext that we can simply go back to the tax rates we had under Clinton. Wrong! His dirty little tax secret is that he has already hiked taxes on high earners under Obamacare. First the law added a surtax of 0.9 percent in addition to the Medicare payroll tax on those earning over $250,000. For the first time ever, Obamacare will apply this higher rate of 3.8 percent to investment income on January 1. Obama won?t tell you that going back to Clinton-era tax rates will actually result in higher taxes on wages, dividends, and capital gains.

They say if you want less of something, then tax it. For Obama, this works fine on financial transactions, carbon emissions, driving, and junk food. But evidently, for him, not so much on a strong vibrant economy. And those Clinton boom years? They weren?t ushered in after the Clinton tax hike?only after the Clinton?Gingrich tax cut!

Rather than working with Republicans on tax proposals that will actually grow the economy, Obama is now simply fighting over his definition of ?high income? while we are left to wonder how much this $1.2 trillion tax hike will slow the economy.

As for the $1.2 trillion spending reductions, the only reason they are there is because Boehner insisted on them. But $100 billion in cuts would whack the defense budget, which is already reeling from earlier budget cuts. Yet the real spending and debt crisis comes from unaffordable entitlement programs. While Obama is insisting on balance on the tax side, he is sorely lacking in leadership here. As a recent Washington Post editorial opined:

Elections do have consequences, and Mr. Obama ran on a clear platform of increasing taxes on the wealthy. But he was clear on something else, too: Deficit reduction must be ?balanced,? including spending cuts as well as tax increases. Since 60 percent of the federal budget goes to entitlement programs such as Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security, there?s no way to achieve balance without slowing the rate of increase of those programs.

We know Obama is open to changing the inflation calculation and slowing the benefit growth in Social Security. But what else? What about the proposals in his own budget, which would increase premiums on Medicare? He could easily broaden his proposals with additional uncontroversial steps to begin the process of strengthening and reining in Social Security and Medicare. All he needs to do is lead.

Some polls may show that Americans think taxes should be part of a deficit deal; but what the polls do not always show is their utter distrust that Washington would use new revenues to actually reduce the deficit. Here, Obama does not let them down. He reportedly wants $80 billion in new spending on infrastructure and unemployment benefits.

In exchange for all of this, he wants to raise the debt limit by enough to fuel his big spending goals for two years. This is utterly unacceptable. Americans know you cannot reduce the deficit when you plan to actually spend more. Americans also know that when Washington lifts the debt limit, it will not control spending. The debt limit puts the very pressure lawmakers need to account for out-of-control spending and make vital course corrections to bring spending under control, lest we face a Euro-style debt crisis in the future.

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney is actually insisting that ?[t]he President?s proposal is the only proposal we have seen that achieves the balance that is so necessary.? Balance, evidently, is in the eyes of the beholder. As the Post noted, 60 percent of the budget stems from entitlements.

In just 13 short years?by the time today?s kindergarteners enter college?entitlements and interest on the debt will eat up all tax revenues. A truly balanced approach must start where the problem starts?with substantive reforms to entitlements. While the President maintains that you cannot cut your way to prosperity, you certainly cannot tax your way there.

Source: http://blog.heritage.org/2012/12/18/obamas-lucy-move-the-football-fiscal-cliff-plan-still-not-balanced/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=obamas-lucy-move-the-football-fiscal-cliff-plan-still-not-balanced

us open tennis us open tennis aaliyah Empire State Building shooting Republican National Convention Karlie Redd guild wars 2

Judd Apatow Bringing Comedic Relief To MTV 'Pioneers' Speaker Series

Producer/director/screenwriter will sit down for wide-ranging 60-minute discussion Wednesday at 4 p.m. ET.
By Kara Warner

Judd Apatow
Photo: MTV News

Source: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1699112/judd-apatow-mtv-pioneers-speaker-series.jhtml

mario batali lone ranger aaron brooks dave matthews band solar flares 2012 whitney houston will toyota recall

New study compares prolonged exposure to violent games to ...

Mon, Dec 17, 2012 | 09:33 GMT

Research conducted at the Universit? Pierre-Mend?s-France, carried out by analysts at Ohio State University and the University of Hohenheim, has found that prolonged exposure to videogames increases aggression in players and coerces them to view the world in a more violent light. Get the research findings below.

On each of the three test days, the study saw 70 undergraduate participants exposed to either violent games ? including Call of Duty 4 and Condemned 2 ? or passive titles ? including DiRT 2 and Pure ? for 20 minutes at a time.

After playing, participants were asked to then read the start of a story, and then at the end come up with 20 possible follow-on actions the protagonist could take, with the players of violent games opting for more aggressive solutions when compared to the passive players.

Then, participants were told that there was another participant in another room, and that they had to compete with them by playing a 25-trial videogame, with the aim of being the first person to respond to visual cues on screen.

The winner would then have the power of sending the other person a ?noise blast? through their headphones ? such as the sound of nails down a chalkboard or a dentist drill. Players of violent games leaned towards sending their opponent a louder, more prolonged sound, while passive players were kinder to their fellow participant.

It should be noted however that there actually was no other participant, just in case someone got their ear drums blown out.

By the end of the study the research found, ?people who played a violent video game for three consecutive days showed increases in aggressive behaviour and hostile expectations each day they played. Meanwhile, those who played non-violent games showed no meaningful changes in aggression or hostile expectations over that period.

Brad Bushman, professor of communication and psychology at Ohio State University was co-author of the study, who said after the test, ?It?s important to know the long-term causal effects of violent video games, because so many young people regularly play these games.

?Playing video games could be compared to smoking cigarettes. A single cigarette won?t cause lung cancer, but smoking over weeks or months or years greatly increases the risk. In the same way, repeated exposure to violent video games may have a cumulative effect on aggression.?

What do you make of the study? Is it enough to form opinion on the matter, or does more need to be done in this field?

Thanks GayGamer.

Source: http://www.vg247.com/2012/12/17/new-study-compares-prolonged-exposure-to-violent-games-to-cigarette-habit/

google stock google stock china gdp dont trust the b in apartment 23 johnny damon kirk cameron news 10

As Discreet Affair Websites Become More Popular; Checkyoman.com

(PRWEB) October 31, 2012

In 2012 it seems that cheating and affairs have become an acceptable practice. There are several online dating websites that are specifically designed to encourage public in relationships to have discreet affairs with others they meet online. Checkyoman.com and checkyowoman.com still judge that fidelity is the ultimate goal. This site was made to help public learn whether or not they are being lied too and to allow public to try and protect what is theirs. Cheating is one of the most painful experiences someone can go through, and checkyoman.com wants to give public a way to privately gather the truth. Regardless of age, race, or social status, this site can serve a purpose. Whether for personal use or to help protect a friend from a broken heart. The process is simple and simple, and sign up is free.

With every online affair site that emerges, public who still value being faithful need a way to make sure they have not fallen victim to a partner that has been deceiving them. Checkyoman.com and checkyowoman.com has chose to be the initially online site to promote fidelity and truth. For more information please contact us through the website or at the contact info listed above.

Social Status

Source: http://www.likeplusfollow.me/2012/12/as-discreet-affair-websites-become-more-popular-checkyoman-com-starts-nationwide-relationship-database-to-promote-fidelity-and-help-people-learn-the-truth/

greg oden st patricks day st. bonaventure ira glass march madness swain match day

Save Money By Having Auto Insurance Today | LoansTop20.com

Car insurance is an absolute necessity for anyone who owns an automobile. Getting the right policy can be a challenge. It is crucial to get the best insurance that not only meets your needs, but is affordable as well. Prior to shopping for car insurance, you should identify exactly which types of coverage you will need in your insurance policy. Read on to get some good tips to keep in mind when searching for auto insurance.

Armed with a list of available discounts, mark off the ones you qualify for and total up how much you stand to save. The amount you can save with discounts can be shocking.

You can reduce your premium by eliminating the drivers in your house who have their own insurance. For example, once your child is old enough to purchase an insurance policy independent of yours, ensure that they have been removed from your policy to cut the costs of your premium. Always keep the amount of covered drivers to a minimum for your household. Only insure those that must be and you will save on your yearly costs.

The main auto insurance companies will often give large discounts to buyers who insure all of their drivers with one company. Keeping your insurance with one company can offer savings in the hundreds to thousands of dollars in yearly premiums.

If you can afford it, you should make your policy payment in one lump sum. Many insurance agencies tack on a service charge if you want to pay in monthly installments. Try paying your entire policy in one sum to save money in the future.

Car insurance rates fluctuate and are dependent upon where you live. Insurance rates vary from place to place based on the chances of an accident or theft, and in general rural areas and suburbs have lower rates than cities.

Always research anytime your insurance company offers you a warranty on parts that were used to fix your car. The auto parts makers usually repair their own parts, and most genuine repair shops put a guarantee on their work. Don?t squander your money on something that you don?t need.

One thing that males under 25 can do in order to get a break on their insurance premiums is to get a wife. There are people that have found they saved almost 40% on their insurance after getting married. If there is a significant other in your life, walking them down the aisle might walk down your insurance premiums.

Consider what a new car will cost to insure before you make the purchase. Don?t forget that insurers have a more favorable view of safer cars. High performance vehicles are not as well-regarded. Remember to include this expense when buying a new car.

Try to get several quotes before deciding on insurance. Every company uses its own formula, based on your driving record and your responses, to evaluate your insurance premium. You will find the policy that is most affordable and best suited to you by checking into policies from several different companies.

If you want to purchase additional items for your car, you should talk with your agent to ensure these things will be covered in your current policy. The retail value of aftermarket rims might be $1000, but if they don?t actually add $1000 to your car?s overall value, then it could have negative insurance consequences.

When you are requesting quotes for car insurance, comparing costs of annual premiums is just a small part of your overall analysis. Make sure you get information on all of a policy?s details, such as the amount of your deductible if you are involved in an accident, the limits that are placed on any benefits you receive and the levels on your various types of coverage.

As with any kind of insurance, when you are buying a policy for your vehicle, you need to have a good understanding of what sort of coverage is best for you. Having knowledge of different types of insurance will assist you in getting a fairly priced policy. Follow the suggestions here to make sure that you obtain the type of car insurance that you require.

To read more articles like this one, Go to the ?Insurance? Category

Source: http://loanstop20.com/2012/12/17/save-money-by-having-auto-insurance-today/

justin bieber taylor swift taylor swift kanye west cbs Univision josh hamilton

'Hobbit' bests 'Rings' with $84.8 million opening

FILE - This film image released by Warner Bros., shows Ian McKellen as Gandalf in a scene from the fantasy adventure "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey." Filmmaker Peter Jackson's decision to shoot his epic three-part J.R.R. Tolkien prequel in the super-clear format that boosts the number of frames per second to 48 from the current standard, 24, has some unintended consequences. (AP Photo/Warner Bros., James Fisher, File)

FILE - This film image released by Warner Bros., shows Ian McKellen as Gandalf in a scene from the fantasy adventure "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey." Filmmaker Peter Jackson's decision to shoot his epic three-part J.R.R. Tolkien prequel in the super-clear format that boosts the number of frames per second to 48 from the current standard, 24, has some unintended consequences. (AP Photo/Warner Bros., James Fisher, File)

FILE - This publicity file photo released by Warner Bros., shows the character Gollum, voiced by Andy Serkis, in a scene from the fantasy adventure "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey." Filmmaker Peter Jackson's decision to shoot his epic three-part J.R.R. Tolkien prequel in the super-clear format that boosts the number of frames per second to 48 from the current standard, 24, has some unintended consequences. (AP Photo/Warner Bros., File)

NEW YORK (AP) ? Peter Jackson's "The Hobbit" led the box office with a haul of $84.8 million, a record-setting opening better than the three previous "Lord of the Rings" films.

The Warner Bros. Middle Earth epic was the biggest December opening ever, surpassing Will Smith's "I Am Legend," which opened with $77.2 million in 2007, according to studio estimates Sunday. "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey" also passed the December opening of "Avatar," which opened with $77 million. Internationally, "The Hobbit" also added $138.2 million, for an impressive debut well north of $200 million.

Despite weak reviews, the 3-D adaptation of J. R. R. Tolkien's first novel in the fantasy series was an even bigger draw than the last "Lord of the Rings" movie, "The Return of the King." That film opened with $72.6 million. "The Hobbit" is the first of another planned trilogy, with two more films to be squeezed out of Tolkien's book.

While Jackson's "Rings" movies drew many accolades ? "The Return of the King" won best picture from the Academy Awards ? the path for "The Hobbit" has been rockier. It received no Golden Globes nominations on Thursday, though all three "Rings" films were nominated by the Hollywood Foreign Press Association for best picture.

Particularly criticized has been the film's 48-frames-per-second (double the usual rate), a hyper-detailed look that some have found jarring. Most moviegoers didn't see "The Hobbit" in that version, though, as the new technology was rolled out in only 461 of the 4,045 theaters playing the film.

Regardless of any misgivings over "The Hobbit," the film was a hit with audiences. They graded the film with an "A'' CinemaScore.

"What's really important, what makes this special is the CinemaScore," said Dan Fellman, president of domestic distribution for Warner Bros. "All these things point to a great word of mouth. We haven't even made it to the Christmas holidays yet. Kids are still in school this week."

The strong opening culminated a long journey for "The Hobbit," which was initially delayed when a lawsuit dragged on between Jackson and "Rings" producer New Line Cinema over merchandizing revenue. At one point, Guillermo del Toro was to direct the film with Jackson producing. But eventually the filmmaker opted to direct the movie himself, originally envisioning two "Hobbit" films. The production also went through the bankruptcy of distribution partner MGM and a labor dispute in New Zealand, where the film was shot.

The long delay for "The Hobbit," nearly a decade after the last "Lord of the Rings" film, made it "one of those movies that had everyone scratching their heads as to how it would open," said Paul Dergarabedian, an analyst for box-office tracker Hollywood.com.

"It's been a decade since the 'Lord of the Rings' trilogy concluded," said Dergarabedian. "There's been so much anticipation for this film and having Peter Jackson back at the helm just made it irresistible both to fans and the non-initiated alike."

"The Hobbit" was far and away the biggest draw in theaters, with no other new wide release. Paramount's "Rise of the Guardians" continued to draw the family crowd, with $7.4 million, bringing its cumulative total to $71.4 millon. The Oscar contender "Lincoln" from Walt Disney crossed the $100 million mark, adding another $7.2 million to bring its six-week total to $107.9 million. And Sony's James Bond film "Skyfall," with another $7 million domestically, drew closer to a global take of $1 billion.

The box office continued to be on the upswing and with anticipated releases like "Les Miserables," ''Django Unchained" and "The Guilt Trip" approaching in the holiday moviegoing season. Dergarabedian expects the year to break the 2009 record of $10.6 billion. With some $10.2 billion in revenue thus far, he said, "We're on track to be in that realm."

Estimated ticket sales for Friday through Sunday at U.S. and Canadian theaters, according to Hollywood.com. Where available, latest international numbers are also included. Final domestic figures will be released Monday.

1. "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey," $84.8 million.

2. "Rise of the Guardians," $7.4 million.

3. "Lincoln," $7.2 million.

4. "Skyfall," $7 million.

5. "Life of Pi," $5.4 million.

6. "The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn, Part 2," $5.2 million.

7. "Wreck-It Ralph," $3.3million.

8. "Playing for Keeps," $3.2 million.

9. "Red Dawn," $2.4 million.

10. "Silver Linings Playbook," $2 million.

___

Universal and Focus are owned by NBC Universal, a unit of Comcast Corp.; Sony, Columbia, Sony Screen Gems and Sony Pictures Classics are units of Sony Corp.; Paramount is owned by Viacom Inc.; Disney, Pixar and Marvel are owned by The Walt Disney Co.; Miramax is owned by Filmyard Holdings LLC; 20th Century Fox and Fox Searchlight are owned by News Corp.; Warner Bros. and New Line are units of Time Warner Inc.; MGM is owned by a group of former creditors including Highland Capital, Anchorage Advisors and Carl Icahn; Lionsgate is owned by Lions Gate Entertainment Corp.; IFC is owned by AMC Networks Inc.; Rogue is owned by Relativity Media LLC.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/f70471f764144b2fab526d39972d37b3/Article_2012-12-16-Box%20Office/id-e532650a7eee4eb6b47e771d3d2da06f

Sally Ride Ichiro minka kelly James Holmes court Rupert Sanders bachelorette penn state